Aspiring Entrepreneur

Flaw in history?

Posted by: Hari on: January 27, 2007

Have patience to read this. It is been proved Taj Mahal is not a burial of Mumtaj but an ancient temple of Lord Shiva. We all know it took 22 years(1631-1653). Prof. Oak who found this, says Shiva temple palace was conqured by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. Shah jahan himself admits that grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai Singh for Mumtaz’s burial. Oak’s inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term “Mahal” has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria. “The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani,” Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters ‘Mum’ from a woman’s name to derive the remainder as the name for the building.Taj Mahal, he claims,the name is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva’s Palace. Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the TajMahal being a typical Hindu temple rather
than a mousque. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan’s time and are still inaccessible to the public. Well, if you follow the below link, you will know the reality. This is where i read this news. Link. Interesting, Specially when the current government open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal and let international experts investigate.

Leave a Reply

About me

Hi i'm Hari, heart break guy. I live at 12o 57’ 41.19” N 80o 14’ 32.20” E. I love blogging.

Top Clicks

  • None
Watch videos at Vodpod and other videos from this collection.

Flickr Photos

il paese che muore

290/365

Untitled

More Photos

Blog Stats

  • 26,285 hits
Google PageRank 
		Checker - Page Rank Calculator
Add to Technorati Favorites
ss_blog_claim=9d6835a4d8e9e629708c3d9a7ff5c841